Packaging Procurement Guide

The Words You Cannot Read on a Packaging Quotation: Make-Ready, Overrun and Spoilage — Whose Risk Do They Cover?

📅 2026-09-11 ✍️ Wuxi Lexiang Printing & Packaging ⏱ 4min read

💡 💡 At a Glance

Explains the cost origin and risk allocation behind make-ready, overrun, spoilage and tooling charges on packaging quotations, and how to compare multiple quotations on a like-for-like basis.

Last year a young buyer from a home-care brand came to me with three quotations, saying she simply could not compare them. A had the lowest unit price but a line underneath reading "make-ready charged separately"; B was ten cents higher per piece but stated plates and make-ready included; C had simply given a lump sum. Her question was: which of these three is actually cheaper?

A good question, because it is not an arithmetic problem. Those terms on a packaging quotation essentially divide risk: who carries the fixed cost of starting the press, who carries quantity variation, and who carries what gets spoiled. Understanding those three things is more useful than arguing over the second decimal of a unit price.

Make-ready: paying for the uncertain beginning

When an offset press switches from the previous job to yours, it has to wash the rollers, change plates, balance ink and water and run up to register. During that time the machine turns, people work and paper is wasted, but not one saleable sheet comes off. That cost is identical whether you print 3,000 or 30,000 boxes — it is fixed. Make-ready simply prices it separately.

So the logic is clear: the smaller the quantity, the more make-ready each box carries. That is why the same box can cost more than twice as much per piece at 3,000 as at 30,000. Many buyers think the supplier is punishing small orders; in reality the fixed segment is doing the work.

Can make-ready be negotiated? It depends. If your job uses a standard size, standard board and four colours, and the supplier can gang it with other work, there is genuine room, because the make-ready cost is shared across several jobs. If your job uses two spot colours, specialty stock and needs its own press run, whatever is cut from make-ready will come back somewhere else — most often through the spoilage rate, or through the board grammage.

Overrun allowance: the easiest term to lose money on

The overrun allowance is the extra quantity started to guarantee delivered quantity. The trade separates press overrun from finishing overrun: the first is waste during make-ready and running, the second is loss during die-cutting, foiling, mounting and forming.

What matters is how the contract words it, and there are two very different versions. One reads "settled on quantity actually delivered, ±3% over or short", meaning the supplier may deliver 9,700 or 10,300 pieces and bill what is delivered — the risk sits mostly with you, as you pay for the excess or must cope with a shortfall. The other reads "guaranteed delivery not less than 10,000, excess not charged", which puts the risk on the supplier, who then builds the expected overrun into the unit price.

Neither is inherently better, but you must know which you have signed. One customer learned the hard way: his contract allowed ±5%, he ordered 50,000 promotional boxes, received 52,300, paid for the extra 2,300 — and his promotion only had 50,000 gifts, so the rest sat in the warehouse for two years. He added one sentence to later contracts: any excess requires prior written confirmation before it can be billed. That single line has prevented the problem ever since.

Spoilage rate: it shows how confident the supplier is in the process

A high spoilage rate does not necessarily mean the supplier is greedy; the job may genuinely be difficult. When several operations stack up, losses multiply: 97% good on press, 96% on foiling, 98% on die-cutting, 95% on mounting gives under 87% overall. More operations and finer work mean higher spoilage — that is physics.

So when a case-made box quotation shows 12% spoilage, do not immediately negotiate it down; ask which operations account for most of it. A supplier willing to be honest will tell you, for example, that the foiled area is large and sits close to a crease, and that most of the loss is there — at which point you can ask whether the design can move the position. That conversation genuinely saves money; haggling does not.

Conversely, if a complex job quotes an unusually low spoilage rate, be more careful. Either they have not done it before and have not costed it, in which case there will be a mid-job price increase; or they intend to deliver by lowering the quality bar, passing off slightly off-colour or misaligned pieces as good.

Plate and die charges: one-off or recurring?

Plate charges cover CTP output, priced by colour and sheet size — four colours means four plates. Die charges cover making a cutting die, depending on structure complexity and size. Both are one-off, but two details belong in the contract.

First, are they charged again on repeat orders? CTP plates are consumables and are effectively scrapped after the run, so re-plating on a repeat is reasonable; a cutting die is reusable, so a repeat should not normally be charged the full die cost, at most storage or refurbishment. Some suppliers charge the full tooling cost on every repeat — ask beforehand.

Second, who owns the tooling? If you paid for the die, the ownership and physical custody should be stated. If you change supplier later, can you take the die? In most cases tooling paid for by the customer should belong to the customer, but without wording you are exposed to "the die is in our custody, taking it out is extra".

How to bring several quotations onto one line

I usually suggest a clumsy but effective method: require every supplier to quote on the same template, listing six items — unit price, make-ready, plate charge, die charge, spoilage or overrun rules, freight and packing method — then calculate delivered total cost divided by usable quantity. Note usable, not delivered: if the overrun rule means you receive goods you cannot use, deduct them.

One item often forgotten is outer cartons and pallets. Some quotations include standard outer cartons, some quote bare goods, and nobody costs the warehouse labour of repacking on arrival.

That buyer re-issued the enquiry using this table, and the result contradicted her first instinct: supplier A with the lowest unit price ended up highest on delivered total cost, because of make-ready and the overrun rule. She told me: "So the problem was not that they quoted unclearly, it was that I had been comparing the wrong thing."

Further reading

Buying Custom Gift Boxes for the First Time: A Six-Week Flow and the Three Checkpoints That Matter
Why Gift Box Samples Get Rejected Three Times: Sample Fees, Production Price and the Review Sheet
Five Die Tooling Cost Comparisons Before Opening a Gift Box: Laser, Plywood and Resin Rules
Three Hidden Costs in Drawer Boxes: Magnets, Ribbons and Inserts
Six Real Actions in a Packaging Supplier Audit

#Quotation #Make-Ready #Overrun #Spoilage #Procurement

FAQ

Is the make-ready charge negotiable?

It depends on the job. Standard sizes, standard board, four colours and work that can be ganged with other orders share the make-ready cost, so there is room to discuss. Jobs with spot colours, specialty stock or a dedicated press run will usually see any reduction returned through the spoilage rate, board grammage or finishing standards. Rather than pushing on price, ask whether specifications can be adjusted so the job can be ganged.

What is the difference between ±3% over/short and 'not less than X pieces'?

The first settles on actual delivered quantity with the quantity risk on the buyer; the second puts a floor guaranteed by the supplier, with excess usually not charged but the expected overrun built into the unit price. Neither is inherently better — what matters is knowing which you signed, and adding a clause that any excess requires prior written confirmation before billing.

Is a spoilage rate above 10% too high?

Not necessarily. Multiple operations multiply losses, so case-made boxes, large foiled areas and complex die-cutting inherently spoil more. The better question is the breakdown: which operations dominate, and can design changes (such as moving foil away from creases) reduce it. Conversely, a complex job quoted with an unusually low spoilage rate raises the risk of a mid-job price increase or lowered acceptance standards.

Do we pay the die charge again on a repeat order?

Normally not in full. CTP plates are consumables so re-plating is reasonable; the cutting die is reusable, so a repeat should attract at most storage or refurbishment costs. State in the first contract that tooling paid for belongs to the paying party, that repeats do not incur a new tooling charge, and that the physical die can be collected if the supplier changes.

How do we compare multiple quotations on the same basis?

Require a common template listing six items: unit price, make-ready, plate charge, die charge, spoilage/overrun rules, and freight plus outer packing. Then compute delivered total cost divided by usable quantity, deducting any quantity you receive but cannot use under the overrun rule, and confirm whether standard outer cartons and pallets are included to avoid hidden repacking labour.

Should we reject suppliers who only quote a lump sum?

Not automatically, but ask for a breakdown. A lump sum cannot be recalculated when quantity, specification or process changes, which causes disputes at variation time. Explain that the breakdown is for handling future changes, not for price pressure. Suppliers willing to break down their quotation usually understand their own cost structure better and are easier to work with.

Need a Custom Packaging Solution?

Learn more about packaging, or consult directly for a custom solution and quote